The government is facing questions over its understanding of how the Renters’ Rights Act could impact the tribunal responsible for hearing rent appeal cases. Leading property lawyer David Smith has raised concerns that ministers have no clear picture of the tribunal’s current workload or its capacity to handle a surge in cases.
Smith’s comments are based on information obtained through a Freedom of Information request, which reveals that the government does not hold data on the average time it takes for the tribunal to consider, process, and rule on rent increase appeals. This lack of basic performance data makes it difficult to assess the potential effects of the new legislation.
The Renters’ Rights Act, which is set to come into force on 1 May next year, strengthens tenants’ rights by allowing them to challenge any proposed rent increases they believe are above local market levels. The tribunal will be the only route to determine whether a rent increase exceeds what is considered fair in the area.
Currently, the government has assured that it will intervene if the tribunal becomes overwhelmed, but there is no clarity on how “overwhelmed” is defined. Without accurate data on processing times and caseloads, it remains unclear how ministers could know when intervention is necessary.
Under the Act, any private renter has the right to challenge a proposed rent rise. This is likely to drive a surge in appeals, particularly in high-demand areas where rent increases are common. The tribunal will therefore be under considerable pressure from the outset.
Smith explains that tenants have little to lose by challenging a proposed increase, even if the tribunal ultimately sides with the landlord. This is because cases can be brought free of charge, providing an incentive for tenants to contest any rise that seems unreasonable.
Moreover, the tribunal cannot decide that a rent increase should be higher than the landlord initially proposed. This rule ensures tenants are protected from being charged more than what was originally set out in the proposed rent increase.
Another important factor is timing. Any approved rent increase only takes effect from the date of the tribunal’s decision, rather than the date the landlord first proposed it. This means tenants could enjoy months without paying the full increased rent while their case is considered.
The tribunal also has the power to defer a rent increase by up to two months to prevent financial hardship. This adds an additional layer of protection for tenants, but it could further extend the time landlords must wait before implementing approved increases.
While the government has given itself powers to backdate rent increases in cases where it believes the tribunal is overwhelmed, there is no explanation of what criteria would trigger such a move. The Freedom of Information request revealed that the government lacks even the basic data needed to assess the tribunal’s current performance.
Smith described the situation as “bizarre,” criticising ministers for failing to collect essential information on the tribunal’s operations. Without this data, it is impossible to gauge the real-world impact of the Renters’ Rights Act or to plan for the additional resources the tribunal might need.
He emphasised that if the government is serious about making its reforms work, it must urgently gather and publish baseline data on tribunal performance. This would provide transparency and allow all stakeholders to understand how the system is coping.
Regular reporting on the tribunal’s activity would also help monitor whether the tribunal begins to struggle with the anticipated increase in appeals. Without this oversight, both tenants and landlords may face uncertainty and delays in resolving rent disputes.
The new legislation highlights the tension between expanding tenant rights and ensuring the institutions designed to uphold those rights are adequately resourced. If the tribunal cannot keep pace with demand, it could undermine the very protections the Act aims to provide.
In conclusion, the Renters’ Rights Act represents a significant step forward for tenants, but its success depends on effective management and monitoring of the tribunal system. Ministers must act quickly to gather and publish data, allocate resources appropriately, and ensure that the tribunal can handle the expected increase in appeals efficiently and fairly.
Download NOW
4 Simple Steps To Becoming Wealthy Through Property