October 12, 2023 9:38 am

Insert Lead Generation
Nikka Sulton

Eviction Blunder: Council’s Banning Order Criticized is initiated as council faces severe criticism for a shocking failure to prevent the eviction of as many as 80 tenants. Bristol’s Labour council recently obtained a banning order against a landlord, compelling them to evict 60 to 80 tenants by December 1.

A Green Party councillor has criticized the council for not opting for a Special Interim Management Order, which would have allowed the council to manage the properties and tenants, facilitating systematic rehousing while the landlord’s portfolio could be sold.

Bristol councillor Barry Parsons has informed Bristol Live news that a more straightforward solution would have been to appoint the council as the rent recipient. This would have enabled the council to utilize the rent for property repairs and maintenance. Special Interim Management Orders, designed for situations like this, would have allowed the council to oversee the properties and tenants until either the landlord sold the properties with the existing rental agreements or the tenants found alternative accommodation.

These alternative approaches put forward by the Green Party councillor and Bristol councillor Barry Parsons serve as valuable lessons for local authorities in handling similar situations in the future. It highlights the importance of exploring innovative and collaborative methods to address housing challenges while safeguarding tenants’ rights and ensuring the smooth operation of the rental market. Such proactive strategies can potentially prevent a crisis like the current one, where numerous tenants are left facing the uncertainty of eviction due to a controversial decision.

Parsons described the council’s decision to issue the banning order in 2022, which was upheld on appeal this year, as a significant misstep.

Bristol Live received contradictory statements from the council regarding its responsibility for the impending evictions. While the council claimed non-involvement, emails between the council and the landlord’s letting agent revealed the council’s insistence that all tenancies should terminate by December 1, under the threat of legal consequences for the landlord in case of non-compliance.

The landlord in question, Naomi Knapp, owns 29 properties in Bristol, with 18 of them requiring licensing. She faced legal action last year, resulting in convictions for eight banning order offenses linked to poorly managed HMOs, landing her on the government’s list of rogue landlords. In 2022, a First Tier Property Tribunal imposed a ban on Knapp due to issues like missing or improperly installed fire doors, damaged walls and ceilings, as well as subpar maintenance of fixtures and fittings in communal areas. Additionally, some of her properties featured neglected gardens strewn with rubbish.

Knapp’s request to appeal based on six different grounds was rejected.

In a recent statement to Bristol Live, Knapp disclosed that around eight or nine of her properties remain vacant and haven’t been re-let. She also mentioned that she sold three or four properties, but more than 20 others still have tenants who have received eviction notices. Notably, 18 of these properties are HMOs.

The council’s controversial banning order, resulting in a critical eviction blunder, has sparked outrage. With up to 80 tenants facing eviction, the Bristol Labour council’s decision to initiate this eviction has faced severe backlash. A Green Party councillor slammed the council for not opting for a Special Interim Management Order, which could have allowed systematic rehousing while the landlord’s portfolio was sold. Alternatively, appointing the council as the rent recipient, as suggested by Bristol councillor Barry Parsons, could have enabled better property maintenance. This situation highlights the pressing need for a reevaluation of the council’s actions and their consequences for tenants and landlords alike.

The ongoing turmoil surrounding this eviction blunder underscores the challenges within the private rented sector and the critical importance of robust regulations and tenant protection. It calls for a comprehensive review of the policies governing such situations, as tenants and landlords face the repercussions of this controversial decision. The issue highlights the need for clearer guidelines, efficient conflict resolution mechanisms, and better communication between local authorities, landlords, and tenants to ensure that such incidents do not repeat in the future.


More Property News HERE

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}