Landlords should take a positive view of the National Residential Landlords Association’s ongoing discussions with the government about implementing a new landlord database, according to Phil Turtle from Landlord Licensing and Defence.
Turtle suggests that this new database could prove to be a transformative development for the rental sector. He believes it offers a more efficient approach to monitoring the private rental market, which could streamline regulatory processes. By consolidating landlord information in one centralised system, it might also reduce or even eliminate the need for selective licensing schemes, which have been a point of contention for many landlords. This move could simplify compliance and potentially improve the overall management of rental properties.
Phil Turtle suggests that the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) should support the adoption of a property licensing model similar to the one used in Jersey. In Jersey, a rental property licence costs just £60 for a two-year period and involves a thorough review of all necessary landlord documents to ensure compliance with relevant rules and laws.
Under this proposed system, landlords in England and Wales would be required to provide various documents, such as valid Gas Safety certificates and detailed floor plans, as part of the licensing process. Turtle believes that implementing such a database would significantly improve oversight of the private rental sector. By ensuring that all legally required documentation is recorded, the system would make it more challenging for unscrupulous landlords to operate. This approach could potentially eliminate the need for selective licensing schemes, which currently often fail to inspect the majority of rental properties and impose heavy fines for minor infractions. Turtle argues that a streamlined licensing model would not only enhance regulatory efficiency but also protect both landlords and tenants by maintaining higher standards in the rental market.
Phil Turtle is critical of how councils often exceed their authority by imposing their own rules rather than following national laws. He points out that reports from the Housing Ombudsman have highlighted a concerning trend where councils fail to conduct regular inspections or properly maintain their own properties. This lack of oversight can lead to a range of issues, from substandard living conditions to inadequate enforcement of existing regulations.
Turtle contrasts this approach with the licensing scheme in Jersey, which he believes offers a more effective model. According to Turtle, Jersey’s scheme checks rental property documents every two years, ensuring that landlords comply with legal requirements and that properties are up to standard. This system is simpler and more inclusive, applying to every rental property without the complications often seen in other systems.
In comparison, the costs associated with selective licensing in England are significantly higher. For example, in Reading, a licence costs £1,000, in Newport it’s £730, in Lambeth it’s £923, in Haringey it’s £642, and in Ealing it’s £750. These fees can be prohibitively expensive for landlords, leading to financial strain and potential non-compliance.
Turtle questions the justification for these high costs, especially when comparing them to Jersey’s more affordable model. Jersey manages to cover all rental properties on the island for just £60, with document checks occurring every two years rather than every five years. He argues that this model provides a better value and suggests that English councils should reconsider their pricing structures and practices.
Turtle advocates for a more streamlined and cost-effective approach to property licensing, similar to Jersey’s scheme. He believes that such changes could benefit tenants by ensuring better oversight and reducing unnecessary financial burdens on landlords.
Phil Turtle is advocating for the removal of selective licensing in favour of adopting the Jersey model as part of the Labour government’s proposed Renters’ Rights Bill.
Turtle argues that there is no reason for any selective licence to cost more than £60 for a two-year period. He suggests that higher fees are either a way for councils to generate revenue or a sign of poor management. According to Turtle, councils are taking advantage of landlords, and the Labour government has a chance to address this issue with the Renters’ Rights Bill and the planned landlord database.
Turtle acknowledges that not all landlords may agree with his position, but he insists that ending the costly and ineffective practices of councils would be beneficial. He believes that such a change could help reduce rental costs for tenants and calls on the Labour government to support this reform.
Download NOW
4 Simple Steps To Becoming Wealthy Through Property