A new petition has been launched calling on the UK Government to rethink its recent changes to eviction laws and introduce stronger legal protections for landlords. The campaign argues that current proposals leave property owners exposed to higher risks and longer delays when dealing with tenants who fail to meet their responsibilities.
The petition has been published on the official Parliament website and will remain open for public signatures until late July. Supporters hope it will gather enough backing to prompt Government attention and lead to a debate on how the Renters’ Rights Act is being implemented.
At the centre of the petition is a demand for a faster eviction process in serious cases such as rent arrears and anti-social behaviour. Campaigners say landlords need a clear and reliable route to regain possession of their properties when tenants breach their agreements.
One of the main proposals is the creation of a six-week fast-track court process for mandatory eviction grounds under Sections 8 and 7A. This would apply to cases where tenants have built up large rent arrears or caused ongoing disruption to neighbours and communities.
The petition also suggests introducing a national database of tenants who have been evicted through the courts. Supporters believe this would help landlords identify repeat offenders and reduce the risk of the same individuals moving between properties without consequence.
Campaign organisers argue that such a system would improve transparency within the private rented sector. They say it would allow landlords to make more informed decisions while still operating within data protection and legal boundaries.
Another key request is to raise the current deposit cap. The petition claims that existing limits are often not enough to cover serious damage to properties or large amounts of unpaid rent, leaving landlords with significant financial losses.
According to the petition, many landlords are struggling to recover costs after lengthy legal disputes. Repairs, legal fees and months of missing rent can create pressure that smaller landlords in particular may find difficult to manage.
These concerns follow the removal of Section 21 “no-fault” evictions under the Renters’ Rights Act. As a result, landlords must now rely solely on Section 8 when seeking possession of a property, which requires proof of specific legal grounds.
Ministry of Justice figures show that the average eviction process currently takes more than 27 weeks, which is over six months. The petition argues that this delay places an unfair burden on landlords who continue to face unpaid rent and potential property damage during this period.
Supporters say that long waiting times also reduce confidence in the rental market. They believe that uncertainty and slow court procedures discourage investment and may lead some landlords to exit the sector altogether.
The petition claims that law-abiding landlords are being penalised under the current system, while tenants who behave irresponsibly face limited consequences. Campaigners say this imbalance could harm both landlords and good tenants by reducing the supply of available homes.
Advocates of the proposals argue that faster court decisions and improved safeguards would help restore balance between tenant protection and landlord rights. They stress that responsible tenants should not be affected by measures aimed only at serious breaches of tenancy agreements.
The campaign also highlights the wider impact on the housing market. If landlords feel unprotected, fewer properties may be offered for rent, which could push rents higher and make it harder for people to find suitable accommodation.
Petition supporters believe that urgent action is needed to prevent further strain on the private rented sector. They say reforms such as faster court processes, a tenant eviction register and higher deposit limits would create a more stable and sustainable system.
As the petition continues to gather signatures, attention will turn to whether the Government responds with changes to policy or guidance. The outcome may influence how the Renters’ Rights Act develops and how eviction rules are enforced in the future.


