Five local authorities acting as social housing landlords have recently come under fire from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) for failing to meet updated consumer standards. These standards, which were introduced in April 2024, are designed to ensure tenants receive safe, decent housing and that landlords are held accountable for the condition and management of their housing stock.
The councils identified in the regulator’s latest round of inspections include East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Leicester City Council, North Kesteven District Council, and Redditch Borough Council. Each of these local authorities was found to have breached core responsibilities relating to the health and safety of tenants, the maintenance of housing, and broader regulatory requirements.
The RSH’s findings followed both proactive site inspections and responsive engagement prompted by tenant concerns or routine checks. These inspections uncovered serious shortcomings in how these councils manage their housing services, with several failing to maintain their homes in line with the Decent Homes Standard or keep up with vital safety regulations.
A spokesperson from the RSH emphasised that many of the problems stemmed from landlords not having an accurate, up-to-date understanding of their housing stock. They also noted a general failure to recognise and respond to tenants’ individual needs, including those related to health, safety, and accessibility. These failures are especially worrying given that vulnerable tenants are most affected.
The regulator made clear that the councils must now act swiftly to put things right. It is currently working closely with each authority to guide them through necessary reforms. The aim is to ensure that tenants are no longer left living in poor conditions and that the councils fulfil their duty of care.
At East Suffolk Council, the issues were particularly alarming. The RSH discovered that approximately half of the homes managed by the council failed to meet the Decent Homes Standard. This standard is a nationally recognised benchmark that ensures homes are warm, safe, and in a reasonable state of repair.
In addition to the high percentage of substandard homes, East Suffolk was found to be struggling with cases involving damp and mould. The council had no clear process in place to track the resolution of these health hazards, putting many residents at risk of respiratory issues and other long-term health concerns.
Ipswich Borough Council also fell short in key areas. The RSH noted that the council had gaps in its property condition data, specifically regarding hazard assessments under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). These assessments are required by law and play a crucial role in identifying risks within tenants’ homes.
Furthermore, Ipswich lacked detailed information about the different needs of its tenants. Without this insight, the council is unable to make informed decisions about housing services or provide necessary support, particularly for disabled or elderly tenants who may need adjustments to their living spaces.
Leicester City Council, meanwhile, had significant failings around electrical safety. Around 70% of its properties had not undergone a current electrical safety check. This presents a major safety concern, as outdated or faulty wiring can lead to fires, electric shocks, or worse.
The council also had no recent stock condition data. The last comprehensive survey of its housing stock was completed in 2009, meaning it lacked reliable, up-to-date information about the condition of most of its properties. Moreover, these older surveys failed to assess homes for HHSRS hazards, which is now a regulatory requirement.
North Kesteven District Council had issues with general maintenance and service delivery. The council was not meeting its targets for completing routine repairs or addressing vacant homes, suggesting a breakdown in the day-to-day management of its housing services.
Only one-third of the homes under North Kesteven’s management had undergone a formal HHSRS assessment, leaving many homes potentially harbouring hidden hazards. Without these inspections, tenants are at greater risk of living in unsafe or unhealthy conditions.
Redditch Borough Council stood out for the scale of its fire safety failings. The RSH discovered that the council had roughly 2,900 outstanding fire safety remedial actions, including 800 classified as high risk. Alarmingly, some of these had been overdue for more than a year, placing tenants in significant danger.
In addition to its fire safety backlog, Redditch had nearly 3,000 overdue repair requests. This backlog suggests serious mismanagement of maintenance operations, leaving tenants without essential repairs and basic comforts for extended periods.
The Regulator of Social Housing stressed the importance of strong governance and oversight within these organisations. A well-functioning leadership structure enables landlords to properly manage risk, make evidence-based decisions, and respond to emerging challenges in a timely and efficient manner.
The RSH will now continue to monitor each of the five councils closely. They are expected to submit action plans detailing how they will bring their housing services back up to standard. Failure to make adequate progress could lead to further intervention or enforcement measures.
This report highlights a worrying pattern of neglect within some areas of the social housing sector. While councils face financial and staffing pressures, it is essential that these challenges do not come at the expense of tenant safety and wellbeing.
Social housing tenants deserve to live in secure, habitable homes that meet modern living standards. These latest findings serve as a reminder that regulation and accountability are vital to maintaining public trust in the social housing system.
Download NOW
4 Simple Steps To Becoming Wealthy Through Property