May 29, 2024 9:56 am

Insert Lead Generation
Nikka Sulton

New data from Savills, published by The Times, reveals why being a landlord is no longer as profitable as it once was. The newspaper provides a detailed comparison of buy-to-let profitability from ten years ago to the current situation, using figures prepared by the high-end agency. This comparison highlights significant changes in the market that have impacted landlords’ returns. The analysis considers various factors, including changes in property prices, rental yields, and the increasing costs associated with property maintenance and management.

The report also points to recent tax changes and regulatory reforms that have added to landlords’ financial burdens. These include the phasing out of mortgage interest tax relief, the additional 3% stamp duty surcharge on second homes, and stricter lending criteria. The cumulative effect of these changes has made buy-to-let investments less attractive, leading many landlords to reconsider their portfolios. As a result, some are selling their properties, contributing to a shift in the rental market landscape.

 According to Savills, in the first quarter of 2014, the average sold price for a buy-to-let property was £161,404. An investor borrowing 70% of the purchase price would have needed a deposit of £48,421. At that time, the stamp duty was 1%, amounting to £1,614. Therefore, the total upfront cash outlay for a landlord would have been £50,035. This was considered a manageable amount for many investors, allowing them to enter the buy-to-let market with relative ease. The returns on investment were attractive, with rental yields providing a steady income stream, and property values were expected to rise, promising capital appreciation.

Fast forward to today, and the financial landscape for landlords has changed significantly. The average sold price for a buy-to-let property has risen to £236,311. An investor now borrowing 70% of the purchase price would need a deposit of £70,893, which is a substantial increase compared to a decade ago. Additionally, stamp duty rates have increased to 3%, resulting in a stamp duty payment of £7,089. Consequently, the total outlay for a landlord today would be £77,982. This considerable increase in upfront costs highlights the growing financial burden on landlords. The higher initial investment, coupled with stricter mortgage lending criteria and changes in tax relief on mortgage interest, has made the buy-to-let market far less accessible and less profitable for many investors. This shift has led some to question whether it still makes financial sense to be a landlord in the current market.

However, the data from Savills and The Times indicates that rental yields have remained relatively stable over the years. While this may seem positive on the surface, it masks the growing financial challenges faced by landlords. The article does not take into account the substantial increase in additional costs that landlords must now bear beyond the initial purchase or sale. These include higher local council licensing fees, more expensive letting agency charges, and numerous costs associated with mandatory safety checks and compliance measures required for private rental properties. 

In 2014, a landlord with a £112,983 mortgage on an average market interest-only loan at 3.85% would have had annual borrowing costs of £4,345. At that time, the expected annual rental income was £10,072, offering a reasonable return on investment. Fast forward to today, and while the rental income might still seem attractive, the landscape has changed drastically. The cost of mortgages has risen, and landlords now face a host of new financial burdens, from increased property maintenance costs to enhanced regulatory compliance expenses. These additional costs eat into the rental income, reducing the overall profitability of buy-to-let investments.

Moreover, the regulatory environment has become more stringent, placing additional pressure on landlords. Compliance with energy efficiency standards, regular electrical safety checks, and other legal requirements have become more demanding and costly. The combined effect of these financial pressures means that, despite stable rental yields, the net returns for landlords have diminished significantly. This evolving scenario highlights why many investors are reconsidering the viability of buy-to-let properties as a lucrative investment option. The increased upfront costs and ongoing financial commitments are making it increasingly difficult for landlords to achieve the same level of profitability they enjoyed a decade ago.

In today’s financial climate, landlords are navigating a low-allowance, high-tax environment that significantly impacts profitability. A landlord with an average mortgage of £165,418 on a 5.48% interest-only loan now faces annual interest costs of £9,058. When you factor in typical annual management fees and repair costs, which amount to £2,934, the pre-tax profit dwindles to just £2,820. This starkly contrasts with the situation a decade ago, where landlords enjoyed more favourable borrowing conditions and lower associated costs.

For higher-rate taxpayers, the financial strain intensifies. These landlords would face a tax bill of £2,940, which astonishingly amounts to 104% of their pre-tax profit. This scenario leaves them with an annual loss of £120, effectively making it unprofitable to maintain their rental properties. The cumulative effect of rising mortgage rates, increased management fees, and stringent regulatory requirements has created a challenging landscape for landlords, many of whom are experiencing financial losses exceeding this average.

The situation underscores a broader issue within the rental market, where the cost of owning and managing rental properties is increasingly outweighing the potential returns. The full article from Savills and The Times provides a comprehensive analysis of these trends and their implications for landlords. However, it is worth noting that the article may be behind a paywall, limiting access for some readers. Despite this, the key takeaway is clear: the financial viability of being a landlord has significantly diminished, prompting many to reconsider their investments in the rental market.


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}