The government has rejected suggestions that tougher energy efficiency standards alone will be responsible for higher rental prices, arguing that the cost of renting is influenced by a wide range of economic and market conditions.
The comments were made in response to growing concerns over proposed changes to the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) for privately rented homes.
Under the government’s Warm Homes Plan, all privately rented properties in England are expected to achieve an EPC rating of C or above by 2030. The policy is designed to improve the energy efficiency of rental homes, reduce household energy consumption and help meet the UK’s environmental targets.
However, some landlords and industry bodies have warned that the cost of upgrading older properties could ultimately lead to higher rents for tenants.
The issue was recently raised in Parliament by Green Party MP Hannah Spencer, who asked what assessment the government had made regarding the potential impact of the new EPC requirements on rental inflation within the private rented sector.
Responding on behalf of the government, Energy Consumer Minister Martin McCluskey said that rental prices are shaped by multiple factors rather than a single policy change.
He explained that the government’s own impact assessment recognises that wider economic conditions, housing supply, local demand and broader market pressures all influence rental values, regardless of whether a property requires energy efficiency improvements.
The minister added that the government’s priority is to provide landlords with sufficient certainty and guidance so they can plan any necessary upgrades over the coming years while working alongside tenants throughout the process.
He also highlighted wider housing reforms, noting that the Renters’ Rights Act is intended to strengthen tenant protections by allowing renters to challenge rent increases they believe are unreasonable.
Despite these assurances, government consultation documents acknowledge that not every landlord is expected to respond to the new standards in the same way.
According to the consultation, some landlords may decide that carrying out expensive energy efficiency improvements is not financially worthwhile. In these cases, selling the property could become a more attractive option than remaining in the rental market.
The government notes that this decision is likely to depend on several factors, including the property’s current profitability, the cost of meeting the new standards, prevailing house prices and each landlord’s individual financial circumstances.
Previous experience with earlier EPC regulations also provides some indication of how the market may react. Properties with the lowest EPC ratings affected by existing rules reportedly experienced reductions in value compared with similar homes that were not subject to the same requirements.
The consultation suggests that while many landlords may choose to invest in upgrading their properties, those facing the highest costs could still conclude that leaving the market represents the more economical option.
The documents also recognise another possible outcome. Rather than selling, some landlords may seek to recover part of their investment by increasing rents after completing the required improvements.
However, the government believes that some tenants may be willing to accept slightly higher rents if they benefit from significantly lower household energy bills as a result of improved insulation and energy performance.
With the 2030 deadline still several years away, uncertainty remains over how landlords will respond and what effect the new standards may ultimately have on rental prices.
For now, ministers maintain that rising rents cannot be attributed solely to EPC requirements, arguing that the rental market continues to be influenced by a combination of economic conditions, housing availability and broader supply-and-demand pressures.
Download NOW
4 Simple Steps To Becoming Wealthy Through Property