
A newly released Freedom of Information response from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has revealed surprisingly low engagement with the government’s mandatory Renters’ Rights Act Information Sheet.
According to the figures, the document had been downloaded only 153,000 times during the first four weeks after it was published. That number appears low when compared with the estimated 2.3 million private landlords operating across England.
Even when taking into account that some letting agents may have downloaded the document once and shared it across multiple properties, the total still suggests that a significant number of landlords may not yet be aware of the requirement or have not taken action.
The deadline for landlords to serve the Information Sheet on tenants is 31 May 2026, leaving very little time remaining for compliance.
Under the Assured Tenancies (Private Rented Sector) Regulations 2026, landlords must provide every named tenant with the official government-issued Information Sheet if the tenancy began before 1 May 2026 and has a written or partly written tenancy agreement.
This includes most standard assured shorthold tenancies.
The rules also apply to landlords who use letting agents. While agents are expected to provide the document as part of their duties, this does not remove the landlord’s own legal responsibility.
In other words, both the landlord and the agent have obligations under the legislation.
For fully verbal tenancy agreements entered into before 1 May 2026, landlords are instead required to provide tenants with a Written Statement of Terms by the same deadline.
The financial penalties for failing to comply can be significant.
Landlords who do not provide the Information Sheet may face a civil penalty of up to £7,000 per tenancy. Government guidance suggests a starting penalty of around £4,000, although councils may increase or reduce this depending on the seriousness of the breach, previous compliance history, and whether the landlord gained financially from the failure.
The situation becomes even more serious if the issue is not corrected after enforcement action begins.
If the breach continues for more than 28 days after a penalty notice has been issued, landlords could face further penalties of up to £40,000 or potentially criminal prosecution.
For landlords with several properties, the fines could quickly add up into tens of thousands of pounds.
The government has also made clear that councils are no longer expected to issue informal warnings before moving to enforcement action.
This tougher approach is part of the wider changes introduced under the Renters’ Rights Act.
The consequences are not limited to financial penalties either.
Compliance failures can also create problems during possession proceedings if a landlord later needs to regain control of their property.
Courts are increasingly considering a landlord’s overall compliance record when assessing housing disputes. Missing paperwork or incomplete records could weaken a landlord’s position significantly.
In some cases, unresolved breaches may also lead to Rent Repayment Orders, allowing tenants or local authorities to claim back up to two years’ worth of rent.
Although a single failure to serve the Information Sheet would not automatically trigger this outcome, ignoring a penalty notice could increase the risk.
The process of serving the document itself is relatively simple, but several common mistakes are already causing problems for landlords.
One of the biggest errors is sending tenants a link to the GOV.UK page rather than the actual PDF document. Government guidance states clearly that landlords must provide the official PDF itself, either digitally or physically.
Another common issue involves joint tenancies.
Some landlords mistakenly believe serving one tenant is enough, but every named tenant on the agreement must receive their own copy of the document.
Using an altered version of the Information Sheet is another risk.
The document must remain exactly as published by the government. Reformatting, editing, converting it into another file type, or summarising the contents may invalidate compliance.
Many landlords are also assuming that their letting agent has already handled the process on their behalf without checking properly.
Experts are warning landlords to obtain written confirmation and proof if an agent is managing compliance duties.
Perhaps the biggest issue of all is failing to keep evidence of service.
Simply sending the document is not enough if a landlord cannot later prove it was delivered correctly.
Landlords are therefore being advised to keep detailed records showing when the document was sent, how it was delivered, and which tenant received it.
There are several accepted methods for serving the Information Sheet.
Landlords can hand-deliver the document and obtain a signed receipt, send it by recorded delivery, or email the PDF directly to tenants while requesting confirmation of receipt.
Keeping screenshots, email records, and signed acknowledgements could become extremely important if disputes arise in the future.
Compliance specialists are also encouraging landlords to organise their records carefully rather than relying on old email chains that may become difficult to locate later.
The wider concern surrounding these figures is that many landlords may still underestimate how seriously councils are likely to enforce the new rules.
The low number of downloads suggests a large portion of the sector could still be unprepared despite the approaching deadline.
With stronger enforcement powers now available to councils under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords are being urged to review their compliance procedures immediately rather than risk facing avoidable penalties later.
As the 31 May deadline approaches, the message from housing professionals is becoming increasingly clear: landlords who delay could face expensive consequences that may affect both their finances and their future ability to manage their properties smoothly.


