September 2, 2026 2:16 pm

Insert Lead Generation
Nikka Sulton

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has raised the possibility of further council tax reform, prompting concerns that homeowners in London and the South East could face significantly higher bills.

The Prime Minister suggested that the current system, which is still based on property valuations from 1991, cannot provide a fair outcome across the country. His comments came as the Government considers ways to raise additional revenue while funding its wider spending commitments.

The issue was raised in the House of Commons by Labour MP Jonathan Brash, who questioned whether the Government remained committed to replacing what he described as the unpopular council tax system.

Brash highlighted the difference between council tax bills in different parts of England, arguing that households in the North can face higher charges despite generally having lower property values.

Burnham acknowledged the concerns but indicated that a major overhaul would not happen immediately.

He said that a council tax system based on 1991 property valuations could not deliver fairness across the country, while suggesting that more comprehensive reform would need to come later.

Why London and the South East Could Be Hit

A nationwide council tax revaluation has historically been politically difficult because of the potential impact on homeowners in areas where property values have risen sharply.

London and parts of the South East are particularly exposed because house prices have increased substantially since the existing council tax bands were introduced.

Supporters of reform argue that the current system no longer accurately reflects differences in property values. However, critics point out that homeowners in expensive areas are not necessarily wealthy or able to afford substantially higher annual bills.

Many households have taken on larger mortgages simply because property prices are higher in their area. Others purchased their homes decades ago when prices were much lower and could struggle to meet significantly increased council tax charges without selling their properties.

Big Differences in Council Tax Bills

The debate has highlighted significant differences in council tax bills across England.

Brash pointed to the example of a typical Band D property in his Hartlepool constituency, where the annual council tax bill is around £2,556.

By comparison, a Band D property in Westminster has a much lower annual charge of approximately £1,048.

However, council tax is not uniformly low across London and the South East.

In Croydon, the annual Band D charge is around £2,599, while households in Reigate and Banstead pay approximately £2,566.

Residents in Lewes face a Band D bill of around £2,756, while the figure in Wealden is approximately £2,728.

These differences demonstrate some of the difficulties involved in reforming the system, particularly if changes were based more closely on current property values.

Land Value Tax Also Under Consideration

Council tax revaluation is not the only tax reform being discussed.

Burnham has previously expressed support for the idea of a Land Value Tax (LVT), which would be calculated according to the underlying value of land rather than simply the value of the property built on it.

The idea could represent a major change to the way property and land are taxed, although significant questions remain about how such a system would work in practice.

Research from Tax Policy Associates has attempted to illustrate the possible effects of introducing an LVT.

Its modelling suggested that an annual charge equivalent to 1.28% of land value could broadly replace the revenue currently generated through council tax and stamp duty.

The figures are illustrative rather than a Government proposal, but they demonstrate how dramatically tax bills could change in areas with high land values.

Potential £50,000-Plus Bills

Under the model, some homeowners in London could face substantially higher annual charges.

For example, the owner of a Band F flat in Islington could potentially face a yearly land value tax bill of around £12,000, compared with approximately £2,900 under the current council tax system.

A Band H property in Westminster that has risen significantly in value could face an estimated annual charge of around £44,000.

In Kensington, the equivalent figure could reach approximately £54,000 for a high-value Band H property.

The impact would not be restricted to central London.

Outside the capital, the owner of a Band F property in Guildford could face an estimated annual charge of around £6,200, compared with approximately £3,500 in council tax today.

A similar Band F property in Brighton could potentially face a yearly bill of around £8,700.

Could Property Values Fall?

The potential impact on property prices is another concern surrounding a move towards land-based taxation.

Tax Policy Associates’ modelling suggested that introducing a significant land value tax could lead to sizeable falls in property values in areas facing the largest increases in taxation.

The illustrative model predicted a possible 19% decline in average property values in Richmond upon Thames.

The report also considered possible transitional measures to reduce the immediate impact on homeowners. One option could involve credits for stamp duty that had already been paid.

However, delaying the collection of some of the tax would mean the eventual rate might need to be higher to generate the required revenue.

What Happens Next?

For now, there is no confirmed nationwide council tax revaluation or Land Value Tax system.

Burnham’s comments nevertheless suggest that reforming property taxation remains firmly on the political agenda as the Government looks for additional revenue.

Any major changes would have significant consequences for homeowners, landlords and property investors, particularly in London and the South East.

While supporters argue that updating property taxation could make the system fairer, the Government would need to consider the potential effect on households that own valuable properties but may not have the income available to meet much higher annual tax bills.

For property owners, the renewed discussion is another reason to keep an eye on future changes to council tax, land taxation and wider property policy.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}